Tell Obama - World Bank out of Climate Finance8 June 2010
The success of the UN climate negotiations depends largely on developed countries heeding their responsibilities and putting money on the table.
At least €200 billion per year is needed to support developing countries, who are set to suffer the most because of climate change, to:
- Develop cleanly and tackle poverty
- Adapt to the impacts of climate change.
But this money will only make a difference if it is channelled through effective and fair institutions.
So far the US administration has been supporting the World Bank in this role.
Funding for climate change must be channelled through an institution which is democratic, accountable and which:
- Prioritises environmental protection and human rights.
- Ensures the participation of affected communities.
The World Bank is not that institution.
World Bank woes
The World Bank is the biggest funder of fossil fuel projects globally.
It has a terrible track record of funding projects which destroy the environment and violate human rights.
It recently agreed a $3.7 billion loan to build the world's fourth largest power plant - the giant Medupi coal plant in Limpopo, South Africa.
Its own Independent Evaluation Group found in 2003 that 75% of World Bank projects did not take into account community participation.
There is an alternative
The multilateral climate fund under discussion at the UN climate talks has potential. If it is to work, it must:
The under discussion at the UN climate talks has potential. If it is to work, it must:
- Operate under the authority of the UNFCCC's Conference of Parties.
- Have an equitable governance structure.
- the participation of affected communities.
- Operate with full transparency and accountability.
Press for change
Email US President, Barack Obama, and urge him to keep the World Bank out of climate finance.


Email President Obama

Discuss "Tell Obama - World Bank out of Climate Finance" in our forum